One of the most enjoyable things about attending SXSW as a
film fan is when a movie surprises you in a positive way. There are so many choices to pick through
when the schedule is released, it is easy to get coaxed into staying in a
comfort zone with genres that one is familiar with. Occasionally, though, someone or something
pushes you into taking a chance on movie you might not otherwise see. When the film lives up to and exceeds
expectations, the reward for the experience is sometimes richer than when I see
I know I'm going to like.
Shuttle falls into
that category. On the surface, it would
seem to be garden variety as thrillers go.
Jules (Cameron Goodman) and Mel (Peyton List) have arrived back in their
hometown airport after a girls-only vacation.
Having no one to pick them up given the late hour they board an airport
shuttle just looking to get home. What
they get is a second trip they never bargained for and one far more horrific
than they could have imagined.
I tend to shy away from thrillers because they all tend to
feel the same to me. You come to expect
the jumps at certain points and I find very few surprises in the ones that are
usually mass cranked out of Hollywood.
This film from first time director Edward Anderson breaks a number of my
preconceived notions about the genre.
The scares are still there, but there were many surprises for me. I appreciated the risks taken in laying out a
few red herrings as to where the story was going to go, and the ending is
something I appreciated for being both original and more than a bit gutsy in
terms of how it plays out.
After taking in a midnight screening of Shuttle, I got to
sit down with Anderson and co-star Cameron Goodman, to talk about making
thrillers that are laced with realism to augment the experience, playing with
expectations, and how in the case of some actors, size really isn't everything.
---
Enrique Gomez: This
particular sort of film has been done before to differing degrees, but your
set-up for your particular riff on the genre is pretty unique. How did you get started with this?
Edward Anderson: I'm
one of those people...it never starts with one single thought, it tends to be an
amalgamation of things. I'm very
interested in the world and what's happening in it, so I'll tuck stuff in the
back of my head and then I'll be doing something and put two or three things
together, suddenly something will pop out of it. I was on a shuttle bus one day coming back
from the airport, and I started having these paranoid, interesting thoughts
about...I love movies, a normal day turns bad kind of thing. I'm not a fan of those fantastical movies
where things like that could never happen to me, like...
Cameron Goodman (mock serious): Like Cocoon?
EA (laughing): Well,
yeah like Freddy Kruger or whatever.
It's not that they're not good movies, but I like movies where I go, "I
am that guy," I have this kind of a day, this happens to me, what would I
do? This is a normal day when I thought
of it, and I thought, "Two turns here, who knows what could happen?"
CG: Those are the
only kinds of horror/thriller genre films that I even watch. They're so real, they're scary for what could
really happen to me.
EA: Obviously a lot
of this film is set on a moving vehicle, and it's not to say this hasn't been
done before...
CG: Not to ruin it
for you, but...(smiling) Shuttle is set
on a shuttle.
EA: Yeah, it's called
Shuttle. Big reveal.
(Cameron starts laughing)
EG: Well, you know Speed was originally going to be called Bus, but that didn't test market well.
CG: Oh my god, is
that for real?
EG (seriously):
Yes.
CG: Is that a fact?
(I can't hold the straight face, she really believes me for
half a second. Edward shakes his head
like a bemused parent)
EA: No.
EG: No, I'm joking.
(Cameron and I start laughing, and if memory serves she
playfully swatted at my arm in mock indignation. Edward smiles with us, then gets things back
on point)
EA: There's Collateral which is largely set in a
taxi. Dead Calm, one of my favorite movies is set on a boat. These are all like minded films, but we go in
another direction entirely. Collateral becomes a crime drama, Speed an action film...this is more a dark
thriller.
EG: As we spoke about
before we got settled here, you want to say as little about the story as
possible...
EA: Without being
boring...
EG: ...and without
breaking any of the big reveals, but you really did ground this much more in
reality than these movies typically are.
EA: I appreciate your
saying that, that was the goal. I think
any time you claim to make a movie that's set in "reality", you set yourself
for people to say "Pffft." (as he rolls his eyes in disbelief)
CG: I think it holds
up to the test, though. I love good
writing...you don't get much of it in L.A....heh (her laugh is both rueful and a
little bit exasperated), I'm sorry to say.
But I can speak for Peyton on this too (referring to co-star Peyton
List, who I met briefly), we were both excited to do this project because of
the writing. It's so three-dimensional,
the characters are so real. There's
nothing fake about either one of them, they feel like real people. Even the villains, you feel like you know
them.
EA: Obviously it's
dramatized because we want it to be entertaining, it's not a documentary. We want it to feel real as much as possible,
and that's why the ending is what it is, because we want to be true to reality.
EG: For myself, the
ending was one of the things I liked the most about it. It takes some real balls to make that kind of
closing to this story. It's hard to
phrase without giving too much away....There are two different ways these kinds
of movies go, either good or really awful.
This sort of splits between the two, and that's something I respect most
about this film. I think it's about 45 minute
mark that I started to realize I was invested in both Jules (Cameron's
character) and Mel (Peyton's), but also in the other people on the shuttle as
well. That helped you plant some of your
red herrings very effectively. There are
some things you set up that go in different directions that you set up very
well.
EA: You can watch
this on a few different levels. You can
watch this on a high concept level, kind of escapist horror. You can watch it more on that secondary
level, paying attention, caring about the characters with still the "OOOOH,
AHH!" moments. Because a lot of those
movies with those moments, you don't really care about the characters. They do some token character development at
the beginning, but for me I felt like given the kind of movie we hope this
turns out to be, it only matters to you in the end if you really care about the
characters. So we spent a lot of time
dimensionalizing them. They were so great
in the performances. We tried really
hard to give all the six main characters as much dimension as we could.
CG: This won't be the
last time I say this...we've been working so hard to keep the ending under wraps
and one of the things that's helped us is that this isn't a topic that's
discussed very much (the nature of the ending) in our culture. So nobody's going to think of it before it
happens. Even if you happen to guess the
ending before it happens, you can still watch this film and enjoy the foreshadowing,
the double meanings, the surprises.
There is not an activity, item or sentence that doesn't have some other
meaning or irony to it as the film goes on.
EG: How hard was this
shoot on you, Cameron, because based on what you see on screen, I would imagine
saying you got quite a workout is probably underselling it by several orders of
magnitude.
CG: It's hard to do
that. I was working with some amazing
actors who having been doing this a lot longer than I have, and they knew how
to cope with it better than I did. But I
really threw myself into it, knew I wanted to commit 120%. It's my first lead in a film, which I felt
very passionately about. I wanted it to
be real, I lived every moment of that film.
I never let myself go for a second, "Oh, I'm just going to pretend to
cry, use fake tears." Scenes where my
face is kind of obscured and you can't really see it, I'm really sobbing.
EA: Just to jump in,
a couple of things that come to mind.
You know Cameron is a very small person physically...
(Cameron laughed at the comment, but it is something I
noticed right away. I stand 5'4", and I
dare to say it might be possible I was taller than she)
EA: It's just a
statement of fact.
EG: No, it's
something you don't get on the screen because of the environment the film takes
place in is so cramped to begin with, you don't have any real reference of
scale.
EA: So there's a
couple of scenes inside the shuttle where, within the scope of the scene she's
acting so hard, she broke a seat, she knocked out a window...
CG: Oh, I forgot
about that!
EA: But she's working
so hard, she's actually doing damage to our shuttle with her small frame. So I have to say I was impressed with how
physical it was for everybody.
CG: And that was no
means just me. And that whole
experience...I found that the spring after, I was doing a lot of very serious
drama because I was still in this depressed area of emotions (from the work on Shuttle). So it wasn't until a couple of months later
that I was able to do comedy again because I was back on track. Because comedy is a very different kind of
energy.
EA: I don't know if I
said this last night (at the Q&A), but we shot the film basically in
order. There were a number of reasons,
continuity, limited funds, etc. But one
of the things that was helpful and was part of the plan was the emotional arc
of the characters. Because we knew they
were going to be in this gradual arc of descent, emotionally and
physically. I think it was extremely
demanding as it was shooting in continuity.
Shooting out of continuity might have been a little bit of a nightmare.
EG: One of the things
I thought of when you mentioned Cameron's physical size...I don't know if you saw
Ellen Page's first movie Hard Candy.
EA: Loved it. Brilliant dark thriller.
EG: We seem to be in
the minority on that, as I agree with you.
One of the things I like about the movie is the way the film is framed,
you lose much of the sense of how big a difference in physical size Page has in
comparison to Patrick Wilson, and that works for you, Cameron, and Peyton's
character in the film. Because the
setting is so cramped, you feel like yes, the driver (Tony Curren) has the
weapons and the advantage initially, but when you have a chance to try and turn
that...
EA: It becomes
dynamic...
EG: So the give and
take that goes on throughout the movie becomes more believable than if the film
happened in a much more open setting.
CG: And I love
that...maybe I sold my character as not being terribly brave, but both these
girls are. When you see girls in movies
a lot...I heard Edward talk about this earlier...you see girls give up a lot, you
see the damsel in distress a lot. You
see the bimbo, you don't really see terribly strong females. Ellen Page is a good example of a strong
female.
EA: She's tiny, and
you're right. I remember when I saw Hard Candy, I had no concept of how
small she was. That was just shot in a
house, our film is shot in a shuttle van, ironically a very large one, but once
you get the cameras and equipment and 20 people, it suddenly feels very small.
EG: You shoot a lot
of close-ups and suddenly you feel like, "Where can you go?"
EA: It's funny, we
pushed to make it feel claustrophobic at a certain point, that was the
goal. But we looked at a lot of films to
see how we would go about shooting on just one location. Really it's not, but it is. So we looked at the classic films like that,
like 12 Angry Men, which is all set
in the jury room, and the way they divided out the space, how the camera
evolved over the shoot in terms of the lenses, proximity, the angles, the set
design. We tried to look at the films
that did that to try and make everything evolve from the first time they walk
on until the end, so that it does get more dramatic as time goes on.
---
Just as with the film, after spending time with Anderson and
Goodman I came away with a better appreciation for the things that I didn't
expect. Anderson had another film he'd
written screening at SXSW, Flawless,
which has already netted a studio release later this month. My expectation is that Shuttle will garner a similar release eventually, because it
manages to pack everything one would expect from the genre (scares, tension,
mayhem) with the addition of things one would not normally look for (genuine
efforts at character development that have meaning, some basis in reality in
the moments when things aren't going to hell in a handbasket).
The blend works well here, both for the artistic efforts on
screen and the real individuals who made it happen. I will gladly take those kinds of surprises
whenever I can get them. Even if those
surprises do lead me to think twice about getting on the shuttle bus at
Bergstrom on the way to my car.
Related Articles
-
20 Questions with Jenn Garrison
-
Ok Go
-
South By Southwest 2007
-
SXSW Music Festival 2007
-
SXSW Music Festival 2007
-
SXSW 2007 Discoveries
-
Running the Gauntlet: SXSW Film 2007
-
SXSW 2007 Music Primer
-
Capsule Reviews: SXSW Days 1-3
-
Capsule Reviews: SXSW Days 1-3
-
SXSW 2007 Music Primer
-
SXSW Capsule Reviews Day 4 - 9
-
Youth Group - March 17, 2007 Austin, TX
-
Youth Group - March 17, 2007 Austin, TX
-
Thomas Dolby - March 15, 2007 Austin, TX
-
Thomas Dolby - March 15, 2007 Austin, TX
-
This Film Is Not Yet Rated
-
Taika Waititi and Loren Horsley from the movie Eagle vs Shark
-
Film School and more
-
South By Southwest 2008
-
Documenting the Death House
-
SXSW Pregame
-
Day 1: Ireland to Akron, Sex & Theatrics
-
Fronting the Nerdcore Wave
-
This Fest is Your Fest, This Fest is My Fest
-
Watching the Watchmen (and Women): A Necessary Death
-
Going the Distance
-
Making the Matador
-
Piled High City
|